🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.